Vargas Teaching Theory Analysis

Vargas Teaching Theory Analysis brain oneWhat are your ideas of article of belief? How does that compare with or contrast to Vargas perspective?AnswerMy ideas of teaching is to give up a positive impact on my students in terms of their cognitive domain, affective domain and psychomotor domain. As a professional teacher, I take in that students have different learning styles and that is why my ideas of teaching and rule of delivering instructions focuses on student center basically the 4Cs (collaboration, communication, critical thinking and creativity). I call for students to have freedom of expression which gives room to open news and creativity. This boost their level of confidence and ability to express themselves out there any time. And eventually, my Ideas of teaching is to challenge my students, watch them grow to their full potential, develop together for the betterment of everyone.Comparing my ideas of teaching with Vargas perspective, Vargas (2013) believes teaching is not just presenting to an empty class and we both have similar ideas on how teaching should be basically by knowing the students better, work on their behavior in every area and finally she doesnt think knowing the subject matter is a major factor on how students feel or perceive change in their attitude (p. 5). Which I totally I agree with her on this. wonder twoBriefly summarize Skinners perspective as it relates to behaviorAnswerSkinner, B.F. believed that the environment is a major determinant of behavior. Skinners perspective people have consistent behavior pattern because they have kinds of response tendencies (Vargas, 2013). He made a discover that most behavior is not the reaction to a stimulant that it depends upon its rear on the immediate environment. Vargas also stated in her book that Skinner believed that it was the consequences of individual actions and not power stimulus that determined what the animals did. He called the behavior operant (p. 8).Question thre eWhat is your variant of Behavior Analysis? Support your answer with detail from the text.AnswerMy interpretation of behavior analysis is that it is a natural science that seeks to understand the behavior of individuals. Vargas (2013) formulateed that behavior analysis is a discipline based on the science get-go discovered by B.F. Skinner and the practices of operant conditioning have spread to all areas of behavior including animal training, business, clinical work, health and teaching. It is the science of behavior of mankind and non-humans (p. 9).Question fourHow can the discussion What is a Cause (page 21), protagonist the classroom teacher?AnswerThe discussion what is a cause go out help the classroom teacher to focus on conditions or events on which an event or behavior depend on (Vargas, 2013). It will help teachers to learn and suck strategies to improve behavior. Also what is a cause discussion on p. 21 will help teachers to know more somewhat dependent and independ ent variables. With this, teachers will know more more or less the number of problems, assignment completed by the students. It will help them to sense what could be responsible for a behavior to direct functional congenators between the behavior.And finally, the way the next generation behave will determine a countrys future more than any other resources indoors its borders (Vargas, 2013, p. 3). She believes teachers are expected to teach more while they receive more difficult students (p. 4). It is important to understand behavior of these students, it is very important to find the variables responsible for these behaviors. Vargas stated that Finding the causes becomes a search for functional relations among all the contingencies that occur in a setting (p. 22). This is exactly what is a cause discussion explained in details on page 21 of the text which will help the teachers a lot.Question fiveWhat new information did you find in chapter 2? Please explain.AnswerThe new infor mation found in chapter 2 of the text behavior analysis for effective teaching is the functional relation which is a systematic relationship between dependent and independent variables. Independent variable explained as circular explanation or explanatory fiction which is a statement that has the form of an explanation, hardly in which the cause essentially restates the behavior to be explained while a mentalistics explanation relies on activities of a hypothesized mind to explain behavior (Vargas, 2013, pp. 22-23).Chapter 2 tries to explain more about Independent variables which buttress more points on behavior which can be circular or mentalistics.Question sixWhat did you already know about Pavlov and his theory? After reading about Pavlov in chapter 3, what did you learn about his theory?AnswerWhat I knew about Pavlov and his theory was that he was the one who discovered respondent conditioning and he believed that respondent behavior is controlled by a stimulus. But after readi ng about him from the text, I learnt that Pavlovs discovery was titled conditional reflexes instead of respondent conditioning (Vargas, 2013). The principle involves respondent behavior which occurs in response to a specific stimulus as part of a reflex. He believes reflexes consist of specific physiological reactions to a specific stimulus (pp. 8-9).What I learnt about his theory as a professional teacher is to be a good observer and a good researcher because it was due to his ability to research and observe that made him observe something surprising about his dogs salivating before the food was put into their mouths. This is where his investigation began. As a teacher, we must research and observe what different behaviors of students must do with their learning.Question sevenDefine the upbraiding Trap? Have you ever played a role in the criticism trap? Explain.AnswerVargas (2013) defined Criticism trap as a situation where criticizing a behavior you dislike or you wish to decrea se seems to work because it temporarily decreases or stop the behavior, but criticizing it strengthens the behavior so that it occurs more frequently in the future.Yes, I had played a role. This happened to me and my wife with our little son at age 2. Anywhere we are going out, hes always excited to follow us but one thing he does is wearing his shoes or slippers the wrongly. After this, we will ping him always for wearing his shoes wrongly, then he corrects himself and does it again and again. One day we realized criticizing him to correct him didnt work for him, so we adopted a method to correct him. Any time he wears his shoes wrongly, we will calmly correct him and once he does that, we tell him good male child or thats my boy and since then, he wears his shoes correctly and never wears them wrongly.What we learnt from the situation above is that we should praise imperfection and reward approximation the behavior we are looking for. And its working public treasury now.Questio n eightHow can teachers use the information found in chapter 3?AnswerAs a teacher, lets start from the criticism trap, we shouldnt criticize ourselves in like manner much because in the long run, you will find yourself criticizing your students. We should learn to use praise frequently and use criticism relatively infrequently especially in the classroom. With these, we wont have problems with students.Another information here is punishment. Teachers must know the consequence of punishing a child because punishment has a bad effect on the punisher as well as on the recipients of the treatments (Vargas, 2013, p. 51).ReferencesVargas, J.S. (2013). Behavior analysis for effective teaching (2nd ed.). New York, NY Routledge.